Thursday, July 16, 2026

Theory Of Bastards, by Audrey Schulman

One thing I want to deal with up front: Many previous reviewers have expressed confusion over the cover. They don't understand why the covers look like romance novel covers. People--this is a romance novel! It has many of the romance novel tropes--the misunderstood and remote female protagonist who finds herself warming to a handsome man--the focus on bodies and bodily reactions--romance, definitely. There's more romance than speculative fiction here.

Events have caught up to this book--I am reading it six years after publication and her predictions are well on target. We have Bindis (actually glasses), we have AI-powered viruses, climate collapse proceeds apace. The social science speculation is interesting--our protagonist is particularly talented at teasing out and quantifying behavior that the participants would prefer to stay hidden, like married women having children by men who are not their husbands. She is also strongly and deliberately unlikeable due to her chronic pain, which she is just getting over at the time of the story. Kudos to the author for featuring endometriosis, it is a seriously misunderstood condition.

The bonobo behavior descriptions dominate the book, and they are fascinating. But there's a great big research no-no in this book--in real life, primate researchers do not enter the research enclosures or interact directly with the apes. This is for safety and for ethical reasons. Great ape research is done through voluntary interaction, but the plot turns on the protagonist specifically not allowing this privacy for the mating bonobos. So we have to assume this takes place in an alternate universe where these ethical and safety concerns do not exist. The plot would not work without the direct interaction of humans and bonobos. Such interaction definitely happens--people for whatever reason do raise great apes as part of their families. But research institutes of the sort described in this story would receive no government funding and would be shunned by the research community.

And of course we have the sexual tension between the protagonist and Stotts, the classically handsome male researcher. This is all described in standard romance novel fashion, and seems to have thrown a lot of readers off. It adds a weird twist to the book but is completely believable, a natural reaction to being in a stressful situation.

The setting for the heroes' journey through the aftermath of a sandstorm reminds me of the movie Interstellar. I loved how they began the movie with survivors of the Dust Bowl.

Not sure I would say I liked this story. But I am glad to have read it.

Friday, March 20, 2026

The Humans, by Matt Haig

After reading this book I definitely get the comparison to the show "Resident Alien". There are strong plot similarities--an alien is placed on earth by killing someone and replacing them, with a mission of killing more humans. Unlike Resident Alien this replacement only wants to kill those who might know about the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis.

But like Resident Alien, the protagonist here learns feelings and grows to love humanity. It's a warm and poignant book, really not about the tropes of SF. But it's not the first time I have read a book like this, and I don't know how the alien protagonists get the sense of humanity that they need to be able to make witticisms about them without being at least somewhat human themselves. They always seem to be species that have given up connection with each other, and that's what they learn from humans.

The book was a good version of this plot. Not 5 stars good, but good. It's funny, in addition to being poignant. A fine diversion.

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

When the Moon Hits Your Eye, by John Scalzi

Scalzi is able to write humorous novels that get at deeper truths and really go places. "Red Shirts" and "The Kaiju Preservation Society" are Scalzi at his peak. This is not one of those books. It probably should have been a novelette, like "The President's Brain is Missing". It's a one-trick book, and those are best when the one trick is researched and taken to its logical extreme. That didn't happen here--Scalzi wrote the science off the top of his head, and spent much more time working out how people in various positions would react to the sure end of the world. Toward the end it gets quite heartwarming, and made me happy I had read it. But I can't lift the rating any higher than a 3. Lots of stories but little depth.

David (Spring, TX)’s review of When the Moon Hits Your Eye | Goodreads 

Alien Clay, by Adrian Tchaikovsky

I absolutely love reading Adrian Tchaikovsky. He is incredibly prolific and yet is able to say something profound using meticulously detailed hard SF speculation on that very demanding calendar. The protagonist in the book, Arton Daghdev (the pronunciation of the name figures prominently), takes some getting used to. The book is written from his first-person perspective, and as a narrator he can come off kind of flip in a very 2024 way ("you'll never believe what's coming next"). But in my view this is Tchaikovsky doing something very subtle with the narrator--he's distancing himself from his story with the wisecracking. The story he's trying to tell is horrible and sad, and he has to get some distance from it in order to tell it at all.

Daghdev doesn't come off as a true revolutionary, at least not until the end. But again I think this is deliberate. Daghdev regularly refers to himself as a small-time revolutionary, much more talk than action, surprised that his minuscule actions warranted a response from the State. He and his circle played at revolution, and he compares himself poorly to others that he viewed as more committed.

The scientific speculation is amazing stuff--symbiosis taken to the maximum. Organisms have evolved to be able to interface with each other, and any macro level organism (and probably micro too) is made up of many other more specialized ones. They are figuring out how to interface with humans too, which seems pretty awful.

The ending is quite wonderful and highly scary. Tchaikovsky is truly a master of his craft, and his work definitely worth savoring.

Monday, December 29, 2025

Altered Carbon, by Richard K. Morgan

This book is squarely in the Cyberpunk tradition. Am reading it 23 years after publication for a book club. The author's take on personal identity and its technical instatiation is interesting and relevant, but the sex, violence, and sexual torture in the book mean there's plenty of reasonable, otherwise not overly sensitive people that just aren't going to get past it. The reviews show that quite well, with some loving and some hating it.

The book is crudely and directly written, and again that's going to mean some love it and some hate it. On the upside, the directness means the interesting speculation on identity is easy to follow. It's right in the title--the Altered Carbon is the stack, the place where your memories, experiences and personalities are stored, and it can be retrieved and placed in another body if it's not damaged. By social convention this downloaded set of personal details is the "person", and a person can be put in a new body and recognized as a continuation of the same legal person. There's a lot of good ideas around this--the author touches on many of the questions I had (How does the "sleeve" (the new body) affect the identity of the downloaded person? What happens when the same person is downloaded into a second body simultaneously?).

The interstellar aspect of the book is not that important to at least this installment of the series. The protagonists could as easily have been from different countries as different worlds. Maybe it figures more later.

Overall a highly flawed and interesting book.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Everything You Ever Wanted, by Luiza Sauma

I'm going to give this a 3.5 and round up. There's a lot to appreciate in this book. The author's description of our protagonist's (Iris Cohen) life is the perfect buildup to her decision to emigrate to Nyx. She leads an apparently privileged (she has a job that pays enough for her to live decently and party) but absolutely hellish (meaningless work, meaningless relationships, drinks hard and eats horribly because all her friends do and then feels awful later) life. She hates what she does and it seems like an endless treadmill. Her family relationships are not enough to keep her there. Though she would have liked them to be. So off she goes.

The world of Nyx seems artificially constrained in a way that makes it feel like it's fake. Sauma spends no time explaining the science at all, just says one gets there through a wormhole and briefly describes what it looks like. It's all about what Iris goes through. The participants are weirdly cut off--they can (and are required to) post about their lives on social media, but they are not allowed contact with Earth and so never get feedback on what they are doing.

.

The writing is excellent and I feel like I understand Iris. It's not a book to lift your spirits but it's worthwhile.

My Goodreads Review 

Thursday, October 30, 2025

The Quantum Magician, by Derek Kunsken

 The Quantum Magician introduces us to Belisarius Arjona, Homo Quantus. Engineered to calculate, find patterns, and understand. But in his case the quantum fugue state that accesses his higher quantitative functions doesn't work right, and he fears it will kill him. He has turned to elaborate cons to provide the stimulation his brain needs.


It's absolutely a fun story to read. The plot is very much Ocean's Eleven, from the assembly of his team to the twisty way the con plays out. But there's a whole lot of fascinating stuff going on in the book--it is idea- as well as action-driven.

Let's start with the variant humans--Belisarius, as noted, is Homo Quantus. He spends a lot of narrative time introspecting on the divided nature of his consciousness. He has come to view the quantum fugue state, where he can understand the most abstract concepts, as an inhuman state. But he brings in his former lover, another Homo Quantus, to go where he can't go.

He also brings in Stills, Homo Eridanus--the Mongrels, humans abusively genetically engineered to live under many atmospheres of pressure. Useful for piloting spaceships under high acceleration. Stills is classic hired muscle. He introspects, but it's all about embracing and fighting that oppression.

The third variant human on the team is Gates-15, Homo pupa--the Puppets, a race engineered by the Numen as slaves, who invert the relationship and hold the Numen captive. This is probably the most fascinating dynamic in the book, providing a lot of space for speculation on the nature of religion and divinity. This is where the book veers toward horror. The Numen built Homo Pupa to need them viscerally, so badly that the Puppets were forced to capture the Numen. The need is through the sense of smell, which brings in the body horror as another member of the team, Belisarius' mentor William (a standard human) volunteers to be engineered to be a Numen. The Numen are kept under very strange and brutal conditions. As Belisarius observes, the relationship to the divine is not moral. Gods do not have moral standing with their worshippers.

The other two members of the team are Marie, a cashiered military cutout with demolition expertise, and Del Casals, the genetic engineer who turns William into a fake Numen. Marie and Stills develop an interesting dynamic when they are forced to work together. It is never sexual, which makes it that much more interesting--they find a kind of kinship. Del Casals is hard to talk about without spoiling it--he's there mainly for a plot point.

The last member of the team is Saint Matthew, an advanced and autonomous AI. His visage is Carvaggio's painting of Saint Matthew. Saint Matthew is in the work to find new religious insights. He ends up as a part of Marie's triangle.

In the end, what motivates Belisarius isn't the money. The con is set up as a way to get twelve Union ships carrying a logarithmic leap in technology through the Puppet Axis, a gateway to other star systems and impossibly well defended. Belisarius starts out telling us that it's about the stimulation, but as we go we see that the con is on the reader as well--Belisarius is an unreliable narrator. He is playing almost everyone against everyone and the inevitable betrayals are part of the con. You can see what's coming but you don't mind.

The action is very well described. The second half of the book really picks up and it's hard to stop reading at bedtime. I definitely want to read the next one in the series.

Theory Of Bastards, by Audrey Schulman

One thing I want to deal with up front: Many previous reviewers have expressed confusion over the cover. They don't understand why the c...