This story was commissioned by the New York Times as part of a series of "future editorials"--opinion pieces speculating on how some event or social trend is going to develop in the form of a newspaper opinion piece. Ted Chiang's version, like pretty much everything else he does, is fully brilliant. His piece speculates on a social intervention where some disadvantaged children are given a genetic enhancement that is popular with wealthy parents--one that boosts the IQ. The kids generally finished a college education, but are still not any better off. He gives various reasons for this that are drawn from today's knowledge, and draws reasonable conclusions. He could do this for a living, except that being a sysadmin has to be more fun.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Theory Of Bastards, by Audrey Schulman
One thing I want to deal with up front: Many previous reviewers have expressed confusion over the cover. They don't understand why the c...
-
I'm starting on the novella nominations for Nebula, and began with The Dream-Quest of Vellitt Boe . This is her commentary on The Dream...
-
There are some interesting theories out there on what Gene Wolfe's "The Ziggurat" short story means . Indeed, Wolfe is heavil...
-
The introduction to Slow Tuesday Night is by Gardner Dozios, the great editor, and he tells us that "only those stories that were the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment