This story was commissioned by the New York Times as part of a series of "future editorials"--opinion pieces speculating on how some event or social trend is going to develop in the form of a newspaper opinion piece. Ted Chiang's version, like pretty much everything else he does, is fully brilliant. His piece speculates on a social intervention where some disadvantaged children are given a genetic enhancement that is popular with wealthy parents--one that boosts the IQ. The kids generally finished a college education, but are still not any better off. He gives various reasons for this that are drawn from today's knowledge, and draws reasonable conclusions. He could do this for a living, except that being a sysadmin has to be more fun.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Horny Chicken
The Horny Chicken is a name that gives one pause. My first assumption was that this would be a Hooters-Bombshells-etc. kind of place. Put th...
-
The introduction to Slow Tuesday Night is by Gardner Dozios, the great editor, and he tells us that "only those stories that were the ...
-
There are some interesting theories out there on what Gene Wolfe's "The Ziggurat" short story means . Indeed, Wolfe is heavil...
-
Dirty Old Town is in F & SF, May 2017. It's a story a lot like Dust Devil on a Quiet Street , in that it feels very autobiographica...
No comments:
Post a Comment