Theory Of Bastards, by Audrey Schulman

One thing I want to deal with up front: Many previous reviewers have expressed confusion over the cover. They don't understand why the covers look like romance novel covers. People--this is a romance novel! It has many of the romance novel tropes--the misunderstood and remote female protagonist who finds herself warming to a handsome man--the focus on bodies and bodily reactions--romance, definitely. There's more romance than speculative fiction here.

Events have caught up to this book--I am reading it six years after publication and her predictions are well on target. We have Bindis (actually glasses), we have AI-powered viruses, climate collapse proceeds apace. The social science speculation is interesting--our protagonist is particularly talented at teasing out and quantifying behavior that the participants would prefer to stay hidden, like married women having children by men who are not their husbands. She is also strongly and deliberately unlikeable due to her chronic pain, which she is just getting over at the time of the story. Kudos to the author for featuring endometriosis, it is a seriously misunderstood condition.

The bonobo behavior descriptions dominate the book, and they are fascinating. But there's a great big research no-no in this book--in real life, primate researchers do not enter the research enclosures or interact directly with the apes. This is for safety and for ethical reasons. Great ape research is done through voluntary interaction, but the plot turns on the protagonist specifically not allowing this privacy for the mating bonobos. So we have to assume this takes place in an alternate universe where these ethical and safety concerns do not exist. The plot would not work without the direct interaction of humans and bonobos. Such interaction definitely happens--people for whatever reason do raise great apes as part of their families. But research institutes of the sort described in this story would receive no government funding and would be shunned by the research community.

And of course we have the sexual tension between the protagonist and Stotts, the classically handsome male researcher. This is all described in standard romance novel fashion, and seems to have thrown a lot of readers off. It adds a weird twist to the book but is completely believable, a natural reaction to being in a stressful situation.

The setting for the heroes' journey through the aftermath of a sandstorm reminds me of the movie Interstellar. I loved how they began the movie with survivors of the Dust Bowl.

Not sure I would say I liked this story. But I am glad to have read it.

My Goodreads Review

The Humans, by Matt Haig

After reading this book I definitely get the comparison to the show "Resident Alien". There are strong plot similarities--an alien is placed on earth by killing someone and replacing them, with a mission of killing more humans. Unlike Resident Alien this replacement only wants to kill those who might know about the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis.

But like Resident Alien, the protagonist here learns feelings and grows to love humanity. It's a warm and poignant book, really not about the tropes of SF. But it's not the first time I have read a book like this, and I don't know how the alien protagonists get the sense of humanity that they need to be able to make witticisms about them without being at least somewhat human themselves. They always seem to be species that have given up connection with each other, and that's what they learn from humans.

The book was a good version of this plot. Not 5 stars good, but good. It's funny, in addition to being poignant. A fine diversion.

My Goodreads Review

When the Moon Hits Your Eye, by John Scalzi

Scalzi is able to write humorous novels that get at deeper truths and really go places. "Red Shirts" and "The Kaiju Preservation Society" are Scalzi at his peak. This is not one of those books. It probably should have been a novelette, like "The President's Brain is Missing". It's a one-trick book, and those are best when the one trick is researched and taken to its logical extreme. That didn't happen here--Scalzi wrote the science off the top of his head, and spent much more time working out how people in various positions would react to the sure end of the world. Toward the end it gets quite heartwarming, and made me happy I had read it. But I can't lift the rating any higher than a 3. Lots of stories but little depth.

David (Spring, TX)’s review of When the Moon Hits Your Eye | Goodreads 

Alien Clay, by Adrian Tchaikovsky

I absolutely love reading Adrian Tchaikovsky. He is incredibly prolific and yet is able to say something profound using meticulously detailed hard SF speculation on that very demanding calendar. The protagonist in the book, Arton Daghdev (the pronunciation of the name figures prominently), takes some getting used to. The book is written from his first-person perspective, and as a narrator he can come off kind of flip in a very 2024 way ("you'll never believe what's coming next"). But in my view this is Tchaikovsky doing something very subtle with the narrator--he's distancing himself from his story with the wisecracking. The story he's trying to tell is horrible and sad, and he has to get some distance from it in order to tell it at all.

Daghdev doesn't come off as a true revolutionary, at least not until the end. But again I think this is deliberate. Daghdev regularly refers to himself as a small-time revolutionary, much more talk than action, surprised that his minuscule actions warranted a response from the State. He and his circle played at revolution, and he compares himself poorly to others that he viewed as more committed.

The scientific speculation is amazing stuff--symbiosis taken to the maximum. Organisms have evolved to be able to interface with each other, and any macro level organism (and probably micro too) is made up of many other more specialized ones. They are figuring out how to interface with humans too, which seems pretty awful.

The ending is quite wonderful and highly scary. Tchaikovsky is truly a master of his craft, and his work definitely worth savoring.

My Goodreads Review